From: Walter Landry (wlandry_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-07 11:35:34
Neal Becker <ndbecker2_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I thought about having the integrator type (romberg, trap, etc) be
> specified as the 1st template parameter, but offhand I don't see
> what value that adds. Any thoughts?
It should be easy to specify the integrator type at runtime. So
unless you can point to a performance improvement, I would keep it out
of the template arguments.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk