From: Roland Schwarz (roland.schwarz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-11 13:06:17
Anthony Williams wrote:
> Both these failures occur on a seemingly innocuous BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL.
I found a note in test_tss.cpp (dated back to bill kempf) saying:
// Dont't call BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL directly, as it doesn't appear to
// be thread safe. Must evaluate further.
> Any ideas?
Maybe this is of interest? Maybe someone could "evaluate further" ?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk