Re: [boost] Proposal to add a Boost.FSM library

From: Pavel Vozenilek (pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-17 15:28:26

"Andrey Semashev" wrote:

[ snip differences between Boost.Statechart and the proposed FSM ]

> That being said, I may only purpose my implementation as a lightweight 
> addition to the Boost.Statechart aimed to solve performance and simplicity 
> issues for small and light FSMs. Is there any need in such?
>

The Statechart library is named as is not to give impression
that this is the only possible FSM implementation in Boost.

-------------

An interesting idea had bubbled up during the review
- a FSM that could be "hidden" within a class and would simplify
internals  of the class.

Something like that was described on:
http://www.codeproject.com/cpp/statebased.asp
but this implementation is IMHO too complicated
for the end user.

/Pavel