|
Boost : |
From: Oliver.Kowalke_at_[hidden]
Date: 2006-12-18 07:09:24
> >> It's quite reasonable
> >> to build things on operating system X version N and have it run on
> >> operating system Y version M.
> >> Compiler running on Linux and producing binaries for Windows is a
> >> common beast.
> >
> > I think this is not true:
>
> I've used such a cross-compiler personally. It works and the
> produced binaries run on Windows.
>
> > UNIX : socket().
> > WIN: WSASocket()
>
> And? When you're building for mingw using Linux-hosted
> compiler, the set of header files and functions and
> preprocessor defines is the same as if you was running
> Windows-hosted compiler.
You have to insert your own preprocessor defines - which could be
handled better with autoconf.
It evaluates if the requested feature is available and produces the
output.
See my example with strerror/strerror_r in my previous mail.
(without autoconf)
#if defined (LINUX || Solaris_10)
strerror_r
#elif defined (Solaris_28 || HP/UX_11)
strerror
#else
...
(autoconf - version)
#ifdef HAS_STRERROR_R
strerror_r
#else
strerror
#endif
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk