Re: [boost] Proposal to add a Boost.FSM library

From: Andrey Semashev (andysem_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-18 13:12:34

Hello Alexander,

Monday, December 18, 2006, 12:02:53 AM, you wrote:

> Pavel Vozenilek wrote:
>> The Statechart library is named as is not to give impression
>> that this is the only possible FSM implementation in Boost.
>> 
>> -------------
>> 
>> An interesting idea had bubbled up during the review
>> - a FSM that could be "hidden" within a class and would simplify
>> internals  of the class.
>> 
>> Something like that was described on:
>> http://www.codeproject.com/cpp/statebased.asp
>> but this implementation is IMHO too complicated
>> for the end user.

> Also, you can take a look at
> http://www.rsdn.ru/File/21403/Overloads.pdf

Thanks for the article. It dropped me a thought of a way of improving my
automatic transitions support in runtime.

Although, I still don't catch the point of creating/destroying state
objects during transitions. This can even be inconvenient if a state
is intended to be visited more than once.

-- 
Best regards,
 Andrey                            mailto:andysem_at_[hidden]