From: Andrey Semashev (andysem_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-18 13:12:34
Monday, December 18, 2006, 12:02:53 AM, you wrote:
> Pavel Vozenilek wrote:
>> The Statechart library is named as is not to give impression
>> that this is the only possible FSM implementation in Boost.
>> An interesting idea had bubbled up during the review
>> - a FSM that could be "hidden" within a class and would simplify
>> internals of the class.
>> Something like that was described on:
>> but this implementation is IMHO too complicated
>> for the end user.
> Also, you can take a look at
Thanks for the article. It dropped me a thought of a way of improving my
automatic transitions support in runtime.
Although, I still don't catch the point of creating/destroying state
objects during transitions. This can even be inconvenient if a state
is intended to be visited more than once.
-- Best regards, Andrey mailto:andysem_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk