From: George M. Garner Jr. (gmgarner_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-18 17:50:03
> I have no idea of the scope of such a task though, but I'm sure it's a
> non-trivial exercise. <
Actually, SSL is almost trivial on Windows, particularly when you compare it
with the OpenSSL implementation. See e.g.,
http://www.codeproject.com/internet/sslsocket.asp. Doing SSL within the
context of IOCompletion ports is a bit more complicated, which this sample
doesn't deal with. But presumable you have already cracked that nut with
your OpenSSL implementation. I have just begun reviewing your object model.
I am trying to identify which interface implementations I need to replace.
I thought perhaps you could help me in that regard. Really, once the ssl
implementation should be largely transparent once the ssl socket object has
"Christopher Kohlhoff" <chris_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> Hi George,
> On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:40:03 -0500, "George M. Garner Jr."
> <gmgarner_at_[hidden]> said:
>> Has anyone developed a win32 schannel based ssl implementation for asio?
> Not that I am aware of. It would be nice to have support for SSL on
> Windows without the dependency on openssl. I have no idea of the scope
> of such a task though, but I'm sure it's a non-trivial exercise.
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk