Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-20 03:26:26

Next message: Christian Holmquist: "Re: [boost] fusion and forwarding problem"
Previous message: Anthony Williams: "Re: [boost] [thread] Proposal to add lightweight_mutex and atomic_count"
In reply to: Gennadiy Rozental: "Re: [boost] If boost::fusion is the hammer, then what's the nail?"
Next in thread: Joel de Guzman: "Re: [boost] If boost::fusion is the hammer, then what's the nail?"

Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> "Joel de Guzman" <joel_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> news:emag2s$6tk$1_at_sea.gmane.org...
>>>> You obviously prefer variant, which is perfectly ok.
>>> I am not sure where I gave this impression.
>> Here:
>>
>> "So my concluding is ... If I keep the values in vectors of
>> variant anyway I obviously prefer variant based version."...
>
> What I meant is:
>
[snip explanation]

Understood. Thanks for the explanation.

Regards,

-- 
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net

Next message: Christian Holmquist: "Re: [boost] fusion and forwarding problem"
Previous message: Anthony Williams: "Re: [boost] [thread] Proposal to add lightweight_mutex and atomic_count"
In reply to: Gennadiy Rozental: "Re: [boost] If boost::fusion is the hammer, then what's the nail?"
Next in thread: Joel de Guzman: "Re: [boost] If boost::fusion is the hammer, then what's the nail?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk