From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-26 22:21:37
Joel de Guzman wrote:
> Eric Niebler wrote:
>> IANTRM (I am not the release manager), but I would STRONGLY discourage
>> taking any changes into 1.34 that are not critical bug fixes. IMO, we
>> need to be much more hard-core about feature freezes that we have been
>> to date.
> I agree with Eric. The problem is that it is hard to define which
> we should allow and which we should not. I think going strict is
> the right way to go now and in the future.
I also agree with Eric. The delay in getting 1.34 out the door is a
serious problem, approach an emergency, IMO.
>> This will be a wonderful feature -- for 1.35.
> Certainly. I think it is also possible to release incremental updates
> after 1.34. I hope Beman's new release procedure (in the making)
> allows such incremental releases.
I'm planning to start discussions about new release procedures the
moment 1.34 ships.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk