|
Boost : |
From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-03 06:38:18
JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z wrote:
>
> Hello Thorsten, this issue was already raised and corrected
> on September 2005, you might want to consult the thread at
> http://tinyurl.com/tpl54 .
Thanks for the hint! :-)
>>Wheter the overload that takes an iterator should be allowed to
>>accept the end iterator is another issue. I'll give it some
>>thought.
>
>
> My humble opinion is that you shouldn't allow an an end iterator
> to be legally passed to erase(iterator), that is, your current
>
> BOOST_ASSERT( before != this->end() );
>
> is conformig. The rational is that erase(end()) is illegal, or
> at least undefined behavior, in STL containers.
Is it? I couldn't easily deduce that from the standard.
> The additional check
>
> BOOST_ASSERT( !this->empty() );
>
> at the same member function is almost immaterial, since if
> the container is empty then end() is the only valid iterator
> that can be possibly passed in.
Well, it doesn't really hurt, and it might catch error where an iterator
from one container is used with another container.
cheers
-Thorsten
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk