Re: [boost] Review request: Boost.FSM

From: Ronald Garcia (garcia_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-03 16:12:32

Hi Andrey,

I have received your request and added this library  to the review  
queue.

Cheers,
ron

On Dec 31, 2006, at 9:26 AM, Andrey Semashev wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I would like to ask for a formal review of the Boost.FSM library
> proposed here not long ago. I've uploaded the implementation, test and
> documentation into Boost.Vault, it is accessible with this link:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/yjozfn
>
> There were several changes in the library since the proposal:
> - Integral constants tagged events support added
> - Transitions maps support improved. Each transition may now decide in
> run-time to which state to transit. The transition map itself may be
> broken into several pieces - the common part and state-specific parts.
> - Added an implementation of thread-locking state machine. It is quite
> equivalent to the "state_machine" class but adds a tiny
> synchronization layer between environment and the machine.
> - The library has been split into several headers and put into its own
> directory.
> - The documentation have been improved.
>
> -- 
> Best regards,
>  Andrey                          mailto:andysem_at_[hidden]
>
>
> PS: Happy New Year everyone!
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/ 
> listinfo.cgi/boost