From: Sohail Somani (s.somani_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-05 14:03:14
> All this does not help much in the current implementation,
> and I would
> not attempt to change any of these short before release. But we
> definitely should do it for the next release!
Soooooo. What should Boost be suggesting to the evildoers who use /Za
with Boost Threads?
At the very least it requires some sort of local patch.
> Sorry for my whining, but I have to reiterate:
FWIW, I don't think that its whining :)
> We should _not_ try to do as much as possible header only.
> This issue is
> just another bullet on my list why we should not.
> I agree there are lot of things which require header only,
> but we should
> try to do as much as possible using the library mechanism.
It would be great to have this as a policy.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk