Re: [boost] Are result_of tests correct?

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-06 09:54:04

Yuval Ronen wrote:

> Wouldn't the result_of library be completely useless once typeof and
> other stuff like that be introduced into the language? Is the
> result_of library just a temporary patch accepted to tr1 only until
> C++0x?

It would be nice if the answers to these questions turn out to be yes and 
yes, in no particular order. But there are indications that decltype won't 
be quite what it needs to be in order to render result_of useless. We'll 
have to wait and see.