From: Roland Schwarz (roland.schwarz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-09 00:02:54
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> I though that in last mail I quite clearly complained about the
> missing error message. You still did not include it.
Sorry for this, but I was not able to figure out which error you mean.
Building the docs currently produces so much noise, I just didn't see
it. With error I just meant the fact that the docs are not getting
build, and that the doc/xml directory doesn't get created (which I
guessed to be necessary from previous observations.) Also I offered to
send you logs of both builds (I didn't want to post them on the list
without need). I even tried to find the exact chekin of yours that
caused this. In light of this I read your "complained" as "urged".
> Eventually, I figured out that the error comes from XSLT processor,
> not from bjam as I've assumed all the time. It appears the doxygen.jam
> version I've merged to branch is broken. I've reverted this merge.
Oh I see, but it is caused by doxygen not producing correct results
isn't it? This is what I reported.
> Now, this seem to mean that we have *two* bugs on HEAD that make
> building docs impossible. Not quite nice, we really should have
> better regression testing for docs.
Yes, definitely. What would also be of help I guess is cleaner
separation of source and targets as we have it for code. So the xml
directory not being rebuilt would not have slipped through.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk