From: Teemu Torma (teemu_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-12 18:10:24
On Friday 12 January 2007 23:54, Gregory Dai wrote:
> In the recent months, I experienced a transition from using CVS to
> using SVN with the same project that I've been working on for the
> past few years in my company. SVN is much faster and much easier to
> use. I'd suggest that boost make such a transition ASAP.
We are also moving away from CVS (15 years of history), and our opinion
is that Mercurial is far better choice. Unfortunately the IDE
integration still lacks and Eclipse users are complaining, we are going
to first go to SVN in coming weeks, and start using Mercurial in
parallel and eventually leave SVN for historic interest only.
I would recommend Mercurial, it is very nice. The distributed nature
makes everyone first-class citizen without write access to the central
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk