Re: [boost] [result_of] msvc work-around -- TESTERS NEEDED

From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-13 19:34:16

Tobias Schwinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is how it breaks.
>
> Let's start with the new bug:
>
> 1.
>
>     typedef int (*func_ptr_0)();
>
>     BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT((is_same<
>         result_of<func_ptr_0()>::type,
>         int>::value));
>
> ==> Ambiguous template specialization, this one got introduced by 
> Eric's workaround

Yep, you're right. I hope find a fix before I leave for vacation on 
Monday. If I can't and this is a serious issue for you, feel free to 
revert the change until I can patch this up.

> 2.
>
> Although it seems to be the same problem, it's actually a different 
> one (just a typo - see result_of_iterate.patch). This test fails with 
> the RC 1.34 version, too:
>
>     typedef int (X::*mem_func_ptr_0)();
>
>     BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT((is_same<
>         result_of<mem_func_ptr_0(X)>::type,
>         int>::value));

I'll let Doug comment on this one.

-- 
Eric Niebler
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com