From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-13 19:34:16
Tobias Schwinger wrote:
> here is how it breaks.
> Let's start with the new bug:
> typedef int (*func_ptr_0)();
> ==> Ambiguous template specialization, this one got introduced by
> Eric's workaround
Yep, you're right. I hope find a fix before I leave for vacation on
Monday. If I can't and this is a serious issue for you, feel free to
revert the change until I can patch this up.
> Although it seems to be the same problem, it's actually a different
> one (just a typo - see result_of_iterate.patch). This test fails with
> the RC 1.34 version, too:
> typedef int (X::*mem_func_ptr_0)();
I'll let Doug comment on this one.
-- Eric Niebler Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk