|
|
Boost : |
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-14 01:54:14
Douglas Gregor <dgregor_at_[hidden]> writes:
> |concept_check|
> class_concept_fail_expected: borland-5.6.4 borland-5.8.2 borland-5.8.2 msvc-6.5 msvc-6.5 msvc-7.0
> stl_concept_covering: borland-5.8.2 borland-5.8.2 gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.5_linux gcc-3.4.5_linux_x86_64 gcc-4.0.3_linux gcc-4.1.0_linux gcc-4.1.0_linux_x86_64 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc
Jeremy Siek checked in expected failures markup for all these tests
well over one week ago. The markup looks OK to me, but the failures
are still showing up. What's going on here?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk