From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-14 07:19:01
Eric Niebler wrote:
> Eric Niebler wrote:
>> Tobias Schwinger wrote:
>>> Although it seems to be the same problem, it's actually a different
>>> one (just a typo - see result_of_iterate.patch). This test fails
>>> with the RC 1.34 version, too:
>>> typedef int (X::*mem_func_ptr_0)();
>> I'll let Doug comment on this one.
> The attached patch fixes both problems. Doug, should I commit (to
> HEAD)? Also see the new test (attached).
...and No.2 is corrected in my copy of the RC branch - ready to fire.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk