From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-17 07:58:46
Tobias Schwinger wrote:
> Thomas Witt wrote:
>> On Jan 16, 2007, at 2:03 PM, Tobias Schwinger wrote:
>>> Doug Gregor wrote:
>>>> Are we talking about a showstopper?
>>> No (not for me, at least).
>>> It might not be too good of an idea to release with a bug in that
>>> basic of a component (and even a standardized one), still.
>> I've to admit that I am still in the dark as to how serious the
>> problem is
> Using a pointer to a member function without parameters (except
> "this") with result_of causes a compile error.
> The problem obviously doesn't break any of our existing tests, but
> possibly non-existing ones.
> Four Boost libraries currently #include result_of.hpp: Parameter,
> PtrContainer, XPressive (HEAD only), and TR1 ('using boost::result_of').
>> and what the patch for 1.34 would be.
> See attached files.
> Note that it might be overly careful (I don't have the Metrowerks
> compiler to verify whether repeating that Workaround is really
> needed). If it isn't needed, the first line changed by that patch (>=
> 1 instead of > 1) will be sufficient.
>> Any clarification would be appreciated.
My 0.02 euros: it's too late to take this fix this for 1.34. No users
have complained about it, it's a core library that other boost libraries
depend on, there are subtle work-arounds in the code for broken
compilers that could be disrupted by the change. It has the potential to
further delay 1.34.
-- Eric Niebler Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk