From: Sohail Somani (s.somani_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-17 20:47:20
From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] on behalf of Joel de Guzman
Sohail Somani wrote:
> -----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] on
> behalf of Peter Dimov
> I need to warn you that there is very little chance for your patch to
> be accepted in this form. Extending _bi::listN (I'd suggest making
> them conforming MPL or fusion sequences) needs to be done
> non-intrusively and in a separate header.
> I understand what you mean here but didn't you say that the whole
> thing would be easier if one was to use a fusion tuple as L?
I understand Peter. It can be done non-intrusively. Fusion(2) was
designed with a requirement that you should be able to "adapt"
Yep, I'm with you both now. Thank you both very much! Good thing I posted before I spent too much time on it :)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk