From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-18 09:50:35
Arkadiy Vertleyb wrote:
> "Boris Gubenko" <Boris.Gubenko_at_[hidden]> wrote
> This is a simple change in explicit-failures-markup.xml. The question is,
> should we (are we allowed to at this point) apply a change that is not
> related to a release compiler?
Fixes to explicit-failures-markup are OK for all compilers. That being
said I ask everybody not to take unnecessary risks. The designation
"release compiler" mostly means that we'll hold the release for regressions.
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
-- Thomas Witt witt_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk