From: Roland Schwarz (roland.schwarz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-19 08:05:27
Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> I am somewhat stymied by the proper test procedures for the current
> boost release candidate. (ie, RC_1_34_0 branch.)
> The documentation:
> Seems simple enough. However, it lies.
> First of all, the links to regression.py are dead.
I also made this experience. I already corrected the links in the CVS
version of this document, but not on the website. (I am not sure about
the policy of changing the current website.)
> In addition, I'm more interested in checking my local build, after I
> built it, not really the workflow envisioned from this script. (As
In this case you might be better off going to boost_root/status and
issue "bjam toolset=<my-toolset>" from there. Probably it also is a good
idea to capture the output to a file for later review.
The resression.py is good for sharing your test results with others on
the web site.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk