Re: [boost] [Report] 2749 regressions on RC_1_34_0 (2007-01-24)

From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-25 09:52:44

Roland Schwarz wrote:
> Arkadiy Vertleyb wrote:
>> What happened?  I thought we were down to 6 failures at some point...  Are 
>> all these new failures just indication of a problem in some low-level 
>> library?
> 
> I am not absolutely sure, but as far as I understood the errors were 
> always present, but masked due to a bug in the process_jam_log scripts.

What exactly does 'always' mean here ? Are we sure those newly exposed
errors really are regressions ?

Thanks,
                Stefan

-- 
      ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...