Boost logo

Boost :

From: Joe Gottman (jgottman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-27 23:43:07


Douglas Gregor wrote:
> Boost Regression test failures
> Report time: 2007-01-27T13:27:45Z
>
> This report lists all regression test failures on release platforms.
>
> Detailed report:
> http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/developer/issues.html
>
> The following platforms have a large number of failures:
> borland-5.8.2
> msvc-6.5
>
> 1668 failures in 12 libraries (49 are from non-broken platforms)
> algorithm/string (1)
> date_time (0 of 14 failures are from non-broken platforms)
> dynamic_bitset (0 of 1 failures are from non-broken platforms)
> graph (1)
> iostreams (1)
> multi_index (0 of 2 failures are from non-broken platforms)
> regex (36 of 38 failures are from non-broken platforms)
> serialization (0 of 1582 failures are from non-broken platforms)
> test (1 of 19 failures are from non-broken platforms)
> tr1 (4)
> type_traits (2)
> wave (3)

    I can't help noticing that 1582 of 1668 regressions are in the
serialization library. That's almost 95% of the regressions. And the
next highest number of regressions is only 38. What is it that makes
the serialization library so fragile?

Joe Gottman


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk