Re: [boost] [Report] 1624 regressions on RC_1_34_0 (2007-01-29)

From: Kevin Wheatley (hxpro_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-29 12:38:48

Douglas Gregor wrote:
> 1624 failures in 7 libraries (5 are from non-broken platforms)
>   date_time (0 of 14 failures are from non-broken platforms)
>   dynamic_bitset (0 of 1 failures are from non-broken platforms)
>   multi_index (0 of 2 failures are from non-broken platforms)
>   regex (1 of 3 failures are from non-broken platforms)
>   serialization (0 of 1582 failures are from non-broken platforms)
>   test (1 of 19 failures are from non-broken platforms)
>   wave (3)

is the logic here backwards?

1624 failures in 7 libraries (5 are from non-broken platforms)

sounds correct

but then the following lines appear to have the broken/non-broken 
counts the wrong way round.

Kevin

-- 
| Kevin Wheatley, Cinesite (Europe) Ltd | Nobody thinks this      |
| Senior Technology                     | My employer for certain |
| And Network Systems Architect         | Not even myself         |