Boost logo

Boost :

From: Kevin Wheatley (hxpro_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-29 12:38:48


Douglas Gregor wrote:
> 1624 failures in 7 libraries (5 are from non-broken platforms)
> date_time (0 of 14 failures are from non-broken platforms)
> dynamic_bitset (0 of 1 failures are from non-broken platforms)
> multi_index (0 of 2 failures are from non-broken platforms)
> regex (1 of 3 failures are from non-broken platforms)
> serialization (0 of 1582 failures are from non-broken platforms)
> test (1 of 19 failures are from non-broken platforms)
> wave (3)

is the logic here backwards?

1624 failures in 7 libraries (5 are from non-broken platforms)

sounds correct

but then the following lines appear to have the broken/non-broken
counts the wrong way round.

Kevin

-- 
| Kevin Wheatley, Cinesite (Europe) Ltd | Nobody thinks this      |
| Senior Technology                     | My employer for certain |
| And Network Systems Architect         | Not even myself         |

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk