From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-02 10:36:05
David Abrahams wrote:
> Thorsten Ottosen <thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>I couldn't find a way to do this. Maybe I have overlooked something.
>>Anyway, making sure that operator<, operator== does the right thing is
> Strict weak ordering uses a single operations and does not relate two
> operations. Thus you can test that < imposes a strict weak ordering,
> but it can have nothing to do with ==. What you're testing below
> would need some other name.
Right. I guess both could be useful.