From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-02 14:57:56
"Vladimir Prus" <ghost_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> Roland Schwarz wrote:
>> Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
>>> These should be marked as expected failures and happily ignored.
>> Do you have any objections to apply the attached patch to
>> and only mark the remaining tests as expected to fail?
> I think if Boost.Test cannot be built as DLL on msvc-6.5, then:
> should go to libs/test/build/Jamfile.v2, not the test Jamfile, thereby
> disabling shared libraries of Boost.Test on that compiler completely.
> Gennadiy, would you object to such a change?
Let's go ahead and do this
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk