From: Andreas Huber (ahd6974-spamgroupstrap_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-05 16:42:20
Steven Watanabe wrote:
> Andreas Huber <ahd6974-spamgroupstrap <at> yahoo.com> writes:
>> I guess so if you want to make it easy for the users. Another option
>> would be to require them to call a static initialize function from
>> main() before they start any additional threads.
> That is not a good idea in this case.
> 1) Each instantiation of the template would need it's own initialize
2) It is not safe to use a state_machine during the dynamic
> initialization phase.
Correct, but at least some users might be willing to pay that price in
return for a really lightweight and fast lib.
-- Andreas Huber When replying by private email, please remove the words spam and trap from the address shown in the header.