Re: [boost] [FSM] Review library version update

From: Andrey Semashev (andysem_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-05 17:14:49

Hello Sohail,

Tuesday, February 6, 2007, 1:08:25 AM, you wrote:

> Is there interest in having a boost singleton? A preliminary
> implementation of it could use boost::once. Then all lazy
> initializations would happen through that interface.

> Just a thought.

I think a generic implementation of a thread-safe singleton is a nice
idea. I encounter this problem quite often. Although, once-based
implementation doesn't suit me very well in this case.

-- 
Best regards,
 Andrey                            mailto:andysem_at_[hidden]