Boost logo

Boost :

From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-09 21:03:48

Felipe Magno de Almeida wrote:
> Why would it? T* and T& have very different semantics.

An optional T& has closer semantics to T* than a non-optional one.

The most important thing, however, is that it will be more efficient
given the implementation of optional (optional could eventually fix that
with a specialization).

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at