From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-17 08:15:13
>> Given that this comes up on the mailing list from time to time - and
>> causes problems - some kind of information would be rather useful.
> This certainly would be a good idea.
> The problem I see is, that boost 1.34 has specified an outdated (and
> unsupported) version of the stlport as belonging to the release set.
> Nevertheless a newer version might well be working with boost, and so
> appropriate documentation would be helpful.
> I got started by a hint from Volodya, who told me to look into the
> stlport.jam file, which has some plain text documentation in the header.
> You might also want to look into my setup for the regression at:
Thanks I did some similar hacking to my user-config.jam file a while back so
I could run STLport tests locally. However, I'm not sure we want end users
to have to around hacking user-config.jam ?
Is there any way we can make this easier for folks who just want to build
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk