From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-19 12:34:15
We still have a bunch of failures in Sandia test results
for intel-linux-9.0. The number of failures seem to went
down since last time I looked, however:
1. There are still failures present here that are not
present in Martin's result.
2. Some of failures, like: http://tinyurl.com/2b7m5p,
indicate that system Python library is build somewhat
differently than usually.
3. This set of test results seem to have appeared after
we've agreed that no new test runners should be added.
Given that above, I'm not sure there's point to look
into those issues. Any objections?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk