|
Boost : |
From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-26 16:33:11
Matias Capeletto wrote:
> On 2/26/07, Thorsten Ottosen <thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>What if you make the members of the view pairs something like
>>
>>template< class Pair& >
>>struct get_first
>>{
>> Pair& p_;
>> operator typename Pair::first_type&() const
>> { return p_.first; }
>>};
>>
>>?
>
>
> It is a possible way to achieve the same results. The problem with it
> is that the size of the resulting pair will be two references bigger.
> This option was analyze and discarded for that reason.
Not understood. A pair of references pair<T&,U&>
requires one to store 2 references. My skecth above
would also require 2 references.
A smart compiler might know it is the same reference store twice
snd do some optimization.
-Thorsten
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk