From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-26 17:06:04
"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> I don't know if everyone saw this post and the *long* ensuing thread
> (I have been away from the NGs for the past month or so) but IMO it's
> very important for us (I mean the authors and maintainers of the
> referenced libraries) to address posts like this one, both to show our
> responsiveness but also to counter the inevitable FUD that ensuses when
> such posts are not answered.
I don't remember exactly . But I don't think there were any valid complains
to Boost.Test in that post, other than well known expectation of different
default behavior in case of system error.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk