From: Michael Marcin (mmarcin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-26 23:17:41
David Abrahams wrote:
> "Michael Marcin" <mmarcin_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> My work likes to keep a minimal subset of boost in the project tree.
>> One of the libraries we are using (I can't remember which off hand)
>> requires transform_iterator.hpp which includes boost/function.hpp.
>> I noticed when merging in the latest RC updates that I had commented
>> out this header as it doesn't appear to be necessary and saves me
>> from bringing yet another library into the mini-boost folder.
>> Is this dependency actually necessary?
> Doesn't seem like it should be. Why not take out the #include and see
> what breaks?
I have and nothing seems to break locally but I don't run full regressions
so I'm not sure nothing breaks.
- Michael Marcin
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk