From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-27 06:29:53
John Maddock wrote:
> Matias Capeletto wrote:
> Nod, we definitely want the set of relations view I think, the question is
> whether this is the view offered by the bimap, or whether you access it via
> a member, so we have:
> bimap.left - left map view
> bimap.right - right map view
> bimap.relation - relation set view.
> But otherwise no special members in bimap itself. In fact the more I think
> about this the more I like it, but I'd like to here what others think.
I like that you have to say