From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-28 11:37:43
A while ago I made a suggestion about using the spirit parser with its
associated xml grammers.
No one has commented on this. I'm curious why this idea doesn't seem to be
attractive to anyone else.. I used it with very good results in the
serialization library. It created a much more robust and maintainable
parser than I could have done by hand. What am I missing here?
Péter Szilágyi wrote:
> Any suggestions how things should/could be started/planned?
As far as I can tell, its already done - there's nothing to do.
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk