Re: [boost] [1.34.0] Sandia Intel 9.0 regressions

From: K. Noel Belcourt (kbelco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-06 15:17:25

Please remove my results and the results for Noel Belcourt that I  
accidently ran several weeks ago.

I'll change the tests over to run against the HEAD.

-- Noel

On Mar 6, 2007, at 1:08 PM, Vladimir Prus wrote:

> K. Noel Belcourt wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The Sandia Intel 9.0 iostreams failures:
>>
>> http://preview.tinyurl.com/2gwtxp
>> http://preview.tinyurl.com/2zljdv
>> http://preview.tinyurl.com/327mdp
>>
>> are all configuration problems on our local system (we're missing the
>> link from /usr/lib/libbz2.so to /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1.0.2).
>>
>> lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root    15 Nov  9 08:41 libbz2.so.1 -> libbz2.so.
>> 1.0.2
>> -rwxr-xr-x  1 root root 70388 Dec 16  2005 libbz2.so.1.0.2
>>
>> I've asked our system administrators to fix this problem but while I
>> wait for them to get it fixed, I wanted to let you know that these
>> problems are expected from the Sandia results and do not indicate
>> problems with the boost tests.
>
> Noel,
> unfortunately, you test results have the same toolset as Martin's
> results. Therefore, we cannot mark your failures, specifically,
> as expected.
>
> To avoid adding noise in regression results, perhaps you can stop
> running tests for RC_1_34_0, and instead start (now or after 1.34
> release), running tests for HEAD, where we'll be more at position
> to address your configuration issues and any compiler-patch-level
> related failures? If so, I'll remove last set of your results.
>
> What do you think?

Please remove my results and the results for Noel Belcourt that I  
accidently ran several weeks ago.

I'll change the tests over to run against the HEAD starting tonight.

Thanks Volodya.

-- Noel