Re: [boost] active objects implementation request for comments

From: Jason Turner (lefticus_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-06 19:43:58

On 3/6/07, Hartmut Kaiser <hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Jason Turner wrote:
>
> There has been some discussions about the future concept on this list and
> there is an implementation of futures available in the boost sandbox vault
> here: http://tinyurl.com/2bxjj5. What is the difference between this and
> your proposal?
>

As far as I can tell, the existing futures implementation does not
support the active object (to provide an existing class with a message
queue) concept, but it could have been used as the basis for my
implementation. I was not aware of the futures project.

> Regards Hartmut
>

-Jason