Re: [boost] [signals] thread_safe_signals release

From: Timmo Stange (ts_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-09 16:34:26

Frank Mori Hess wrote:

> Timmo Stange 
> also has another thread-safe implementation he's been working on in 
> parallel, which is similar in interface to thread_safe_signals, but uses 
> much more of the original Boost.Signals codebase.

I actually think there's not much common code with the original Signals
in my implementation anymore, but I used it heavily for reference to
avoid incompatibility surprises. It also does not comply with the recent
interface changes we discussed as I simply did not have any time to work
on it. I'm still planning to get a working version some time soon
though. I will also look at your current implementation more closely
then.

Do you have any threaded testing code you could share, btw? I've
thought about modifying the random signals system, but with the book-
keeping it would become heavily serialized and thus not very useful.

Regards

Timmo Stange