Re: [boost] [futures] boost::futures

From: Christopher Kohlhoff (chris_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-12 18:07:02

On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:38:42 +0200, "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>
said:
> To elaborate on Chris's point, the significance of keeping the producer
> and 
> the consumer interface separate is that it allows future<R> to be made 
> convertible to future<R2> whenever R is convertible to R2 (or R2 is
> void); 

Are there any implications for the ability for movability of the result
if you allow such conversions?

Cheers,
Chris