Re: [boost] active objects implementation request for comments

From: Jason Turner (lefticus_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-13 10:52:46

Looks well done, taking into account just about everything I was
concerned about (and more) and making use of the existing future<>.
The only thing I would do differently, I think, is add an
active_object<> wrapper similar to what is in my library. Basically, I
can see a use to providing any generic class with a message queue.

Thanks for the docs, let me know if there are any areas which you
could see using some help.

-Jason

On 3/9/07, Frank Mori Hess <frank.hess_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 March 2007 15:51 pm, Frank Mori Hess wrote:
> >
> > I'll whip up some basic doxygen documentation so the library interface
> > is more intelligible.  I'll try to get the code and documentation online
> > somewhere before this weekend, and you can see if it interests you.
> >
>
> I've got some basic documentation for my active object library done, and
> the code available from cvs now.  See
>
> http://www.comedi.org/projects/libpoet/index.html
>
> for more information.
>
> --
> Frank
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>
>

-- 
http://emptycrate.com Games, Programming, Travel & other stuff