|
Boost : |
From: Frank Mori Hess (frank.hess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-14 14:09:37
On Tuesday 13 March 2007 23:55 pm, braddock wrote:
> I'm looking for input. I'd be willing to add additional functionality
> needed and progress it to the point where it could be formally submitted
> into boost if there is interest. It could perhaps be merged into the
> existing futures implementation in the vault to add combined groups,
> etc.
> -add_callback() permits arbitrary functions to be called when the future
> is set. This is needed to build non-intrusive compound waiting
> structures, like future_groups, or to better support continuation
> scheduling concepts, as in coroutines.
I'd prefer a signal/slot to add_callback(). That is: thread_safe_signals
and moving to Boost.Signals when a thread-safe version is accepted.
> TODO:
>
> The following class of sub-type assignments should be made possible, as
> discussed by Frank Hess and Peter Dimov on the list.
>
> class A {};
> class B : public A {};
> promise<shared_ptr<B> > p;
> future<shared_ptr<A> > f(p);
That isn't what I was talking about (although I agree it should be made
possible). But B doesn't have to be derived from A. If you can do
A a;
B b = a;
then you should be able to do (without blocking)
promise<A> p;
future<A> fa(p);
future<B> fb = fa;
For example, if I have an active_function that returns a future<unsigned>
then I should be able to pass that return value to an active_function that
takes a future<int> as a parameter and it should "just work".
Another suggestion is to rename promise::set() (boring) to
promise::fulfill() (makes me smile). And if there is an opportunity to
work the name "empty_promise" in as a class or a concept, that would be
clever too.
Other things I would need to replace poet::future with your future class:
-Constructing a future from another with an incompatible template type via
a user-supplied conversion function. Useful for extracting future
elements from future containers, for example.
-Adding a promise::fulfill() that accepts a future with a compatible
template type. The effect would be that promise::fulfill() would be
called with the value from the future when it is ready.
-- Frank
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk