From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-14 15:05:52
Frank Mori Hess wrote:
> I have to say I really am not a big fan of needless
> overloading of the languages operators like logical || and
> &&. Especially when you are overloading them with functions
> that really don't correspond to the original operators. What
> if I want to overload || with a function that actually does
> correspond to logical or, like
> Future<bool> operator||(const Future<T> &a, const Future<U> &b);
1. Why do you would do that? Do you have a use case?
2. If you really have to do that, simply do not include the header(s)
defining the operators.