|
Boost : |
From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-16 13:47:02
"Mathias Gaunard" <mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:etei0b$o33$1_at_sea.gmane.org...
> Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
>> "Mathias Gaunard" <mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>>> They're a more time and space efficient alternative for node-based
>>> containers of pointers when you have the possibility of modifying the
>>> type to make it into a node.
>>
>> Why? And how much? I need specific numbers.
>>
>>> So basically, if you have std::list<T*>, and you can modify T, then it
>>> is more efficient to use std::ilist<T>.
>>
>> Why? how std::list<T*> prevent you to modify the pointed value and/or how
>> does it affect performance?
>
> Because std::list<T*> generates a node type that should look like that:
>
> struct list_node
> {
> T* value;
> list_node* next;
> list_node* prev;
> };
>
> This adds some indirection.
So? could you give an example of an algorithm? And/or other speific
performace advantage example?
Gennadiy
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk