Re: [boost] Ion Gaztañaga's Intrusive Library

From: Timmo Stange (ts_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-16 20:03:02

Tobias Schwinger wrote:

> Anyway, I still don't understand why we can't have intrusive containers 
> without intrusive syntax. E.g:
> 
>      struct slist_node // <-- part of container implementation
>      {
>          T element; // note: held by value
>          slist_node * next;
>      };
> 
> Then there's only one allocation per 'slist_node'.

What's the difference between that and the standard (non-intrusive)
containers?

Regards

Timmo Stange