From: Sohail Somani (s.somani_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-19 17:29:45
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Jeff Garland
> Sohail Somani wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> >> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Martin Wille
> >> Why?
> >> Users of the POSIX API wouldn't want to adjust their existing
> >> code for
> >> it. (As a side node, there seems to be significant
> resistance against
> >> adding shallow C++ wrappers around POSIX functions in the
> POSIX C++
> >> Binding Study Group List)
> > Interesting. Why?
> Yeah, I'd call it depressing.
LOL! Well, pthreads is pretty functional and doesn't get in the way too
often... I was pretty much hoping for boost threads + cancellation.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk