From: Arkadiy Vertleyb (vertleyb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-20 15:55:47
"Daniel Walker" <daniel.j.walker_at_[hidden]> wrote
> I believe Boost.Typeof would handle the Fusion
> case as well as any future conventions adopted by future libraries.
> Still, for compilers that Boost.Typeof doesn't support, it would be
> nice if result_of could handle Boost.Lambda at least. More recent
> libraries and future libraries could consider adopting a previously
> existing practice (result<F(Args) or sig<tuple<Args> >) that result_of
> can support without typeof.
Please note that typeof strips top-level references, and therefore its usage
in relation to result_of is very limited and may not give the correct result
unless you are sure that the result is not a reference.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk