Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al

From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-22 13:04:15

> > Pthread is there, standardized, proven in practice, so why > > not make use of it? In addition, there is a lot of legacy > > pthread code which N2178 makes compatible with future C++ > > <thread> based code. I consider both to be Good Things.> > Some of the most annoying problems in C++ directly stem from being> compatible with C :-/
This statement would be off-topic unless you mean that there are problems in N2178 that stem from the fact that it's based on pthread.
 
Emil Dotchevski
_________________________________________________________________
Take a break and play crossword puzzles - FREE!
http://games.msn.com/en/flexicon/default.htm?icid=flexicon_ wlmemailtaglinemarch07