|
Boost :
|
- Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al"
- Previous message: Ion Gaztañaga: "Re: [boost] [Boost-announce] Review of Intrusive library begins today"
- In reply to: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al"
- Next in thread: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al"
- Reply: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al"
Peter Dimov wrote:
> The join2 functions illustrate another point where I believe N2178 is
> superior to N2184: they expose the superior Windows join model at the C++
> level instead of the more limited pthread_join. It's trivial to make an
> n2184::thread provide the same semantics under Windows, but nobody would be
> able to take advantage of them portably.
The Windows superior join model? Can you please explain what do you mean
by that?
- Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al"
- Previous message: Ion Gaztañaga: "Re: [boost] [Boost-announce] Review of Intrusive library begins today"
- In reply to: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al"
- Next in thread: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al"
- Reply: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk