Boost logo

Boost :

From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-22 20:35:07


Hi all,

Is there a rational for the different behavior (signature) of the
atomic_count::operator++()?

This operator returns long (the new value) on Win32 and Solaris, but has no
return type (void) on pthread and gcc based systems.

Regards Hartmut


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk